Category Archives: MicroFarm

The Farm of 2030

The 2015 LandWISE Annual Conference attracted record numbers. It’s theme looked forward 15 years to contemplate what a farm might look like in 2030.

We are most grateful for the strong support of our many sponsors, a vital feature for bringing such events to the community.Sponsor_Sheet_600

 

You can see the full programme here>

RobertFitch2 TristanPerez1 Cheryl-McCarthy

Three speakers, Robert Fitch, Tristan Perez and Cheryl McCarthy, travelled from Australia to help lead discussions.

Tom Botterill PeterSchaare Ian Yule

Add Tom Botterill, Peter Schaare and Ian Yule

GertHattingh John Ahearn JohnChapman

Gert Hattingh, John Ahearn and John Chapman

BruceSearle200 FinlaysonChristina_200x200 geoff-low-res-e1423206134526

Bruce Searle, Christine Finlayson and Geoff Bates plus others from New Zealand and see the wealth of knowledge and experience available.

You can see all speakers and their biographies here>

On Day 1, presenters discussed sensing, control and robotics. Developments in this area are proceeding remarkably fast, with prototype machines finding their own way around farms, identifying weeds by species and applying custom treatments including sprays only to leaves. Additional presentations on pasture and plant quality detection, grapevine pruning and fruit quality analysis made it a full informative day.

At the end of the day, delegates formed small teams to design their dream agricultural robots – an excellent way to consolidate information. The key however, was identifying what their robots should do (not how) and describing the constraints under which it would need to operate.

As soon as you state a “how” you limit the options that can be considered in determining the final design. Maybe it shouldn’t be a 4-wheeled rover, but an aerial vehicle, or even a ground crawler. Get the specifications right, and the design will identify itself.

AgBot - image from Queensland University of Technology
AgBot – image from Queensland University of Technology

Day 2 began with discussions around variability. Identifying what variability exists, where it is and whether it justifies custom management is a critical starting place. Speakers also focused on managing two important farm  inputs to ensure the right job is done – seed placement and fertiliser application.

Day 2 was completed at the LandWISE MicroFarm at the Centre for Land and Water. There were demonstrations of in-field nitrogen testing, a soil pit to examine, a robot pulling a urine patch detector, a one pass strip-till and planting machine, testing fertiliser spreaders and UAVs.

AltusMissionNDVI
An AltusUAS UAV takes off at the Centre for Land and Water, a mission to collect data at the LandWISE MicroFarm

Something for every forward thinking agriculturist!

More on-line here>

 

MicroFarm Update March 2015

MicroFarm happenings are updated on Twitter @LandWISENZ with tweets appearing on both the LandWISE main website and the MicroFarm specific site.

The aerial view above of the MicroFarm was provided by new Centre for Land and Water residents, AltusUAS. This is a wide angle colour image, but we are also looking forward to capturing a range of other image types over coming weeks.

So far this season we have completed fourteen irrigation rotations across our various crops. We have guidance from HydroServices soil moisture monitoring and advice. Their weekly reports are posted on the MicroFarm Irrigation Monitoring page.

The linear-move irrigator that the Ritchie family  provided has been critical to success this year – one of the driest we’ve seen for a while. In August we posted a story about rebuilding the linear from parts.

Now, part way through Cyclone Pam, Hawke’s Bay is getting much needed rain. In our case, this has been a manageable amount and we have been fortunate to avoid the strong winds that have caused trouble north of us.

Since last week we’ve received regular showers, with daily rain totals of 20mm, 10mm, 0mm, 5mm and 25mm and moderate rain continuing. So 75mm so far, with about 12mm ET in that time. You can access our weather data from the MicroFarm site weather page, provided for us by HortPlus MetWatch.

Cover crops planted last month are coming away well. We irrigated them to get them started, but with the current rain, that is probably it for the season. The mustard and the oat/vetch mix were both direct drilled by Mike Kettle Contracting.

Our two crops awaiting harvest are sweetcorn for McCain Foods and navy beans for Heinz-Watties. Both crops are looking good.

Looking at the AltusUAS image above, the gaps in the sweetcorn on the left are where crop samples were taken to compare growth of seedlings with and without cover.

At the far end of the MicroFarm, the navy beans glow yellow as they reach maturity. Despite the colour change, HydroServices soil moisture monitoring shows water use has remained high, suggesting plants remain active.

The four white squares in the paddocks on the right are cover cloth on our cover crops: mustard and on an oat/vetch blend. We will remove two covers soon and monitor growth. Two other covers will remain in place for a few more weeks.

We are keen to involve even more technology partners at the MicroFarm.

Wintec has established a trial network of soil moisture sensors which are being compared with the HydroServices neutron probe results.

Installing the WINTEC wireless soil moisture sensor array
Installing the WINTEC wireless soil moisture sensor array

CoverMapOnionsASL software, (LandWISE Yield Estimation software) and apps for pipfruit and irrigation industries) have developed a ground cover measurement tool. We used it to map MicroFarm onion crop canopies and found good correlation with final yields.

If you have something to test or demonstrate, or know someone that might add value, let us know!

Remember, you can follow @LandWISENZ on Twitter, or keep an eye on the MicroFarm website for the most up to date information on happenings.

2015: International Year of Soils

The Food and Agricultural Organisation FAO “International Year of Soils” is now well under way. We are looking to do our part in raising awareness and welcome ideas for activities and actions.

Hawke’s Bay Regional Council is a Platinum Sponsor of our annual conference, recognising the importance of soils to our region. We will have a soil health component at the Field Sessions.

The LandWISE MicroFarm is also looking at how we might help soil help us. Following our onion crop, we direct drilled cover crops.

20150220_Kettle
Cover crops being direct drilled into old onion beds by Mike Kettle Contractors

The crops themselves, Caliente Mustard in one half and an oat/vetch combination in the other, are intended to aid soil health, adding biomass and structural quality.  The mustard will need to be incorporated to provide soil fumigant activity before the next crop. But we anticipate positive nett benefit to our soil.

You can download a copy of the FAO  Bulletin “International Year of Soils here>

MicroFarm News: Dec 2014

Recent postings on the MicroFarm Website

To December 2014

20141114_165126_web

Monitoring Variability in Peas

Peas are one crop that has huge variation. It’s hard to know if the crop will yield four tonnes per hectare or twelve. Even within small sampling plots we measured yields less than 4 t/ha and greater than 13 t/ha. More>

20141128_103522-web

Monitoring Variability in Onions

Our first MicroFarm onion crop is extremely variable. We want to measure variability so we can better assess it. If we can measure objectively we can make better decisions. We are interested in spatial variability and temporal variability. More>

Variability

Variability in crops implies lost production. While the very best parts in a paddock may still give less than potential yields, anything less is a sure sign of loss.

LandWISE developed a simple “crop loss calculator” called YieldEst. The purpose of YieldEst is to assess how much crop variability is costing a grower.

Calculator

We have been watching establishment of the onion and pea crops at the MicroFarm. Both have shown high levels of variability, apparent very early in crop establishment. From there it can only increase.

We have visited a number of other sites this spring, looking in particular at crop establishment and seeking reasons for variations seen.  We have been a little surprised at the level of acceptance among growers; not happy but somewhat resigned.

Where does variability start? What are the most important causes? What can we do about it?

Variability starts at the start; with variations in genetic potential within seeds in a line. It is surprising how little we really know about this. We do know hybrid lines can be more uniform that open pollinated ones, mainly because they have a narrower genetic spread. But gene differences are hugely complex too. One gene can express differently depending on environmental factors. For example, we don’t know much about the effect that growing conditions of the mother plant may have on the seed we sow.

We have an idea about soil conditions for best establishment, although we wonder if we don’t over-cultivate to get a satisfactory seedbed. We hope we don’t have carry-over herbicides or weeds so growers have started using precision ag section control to get the right dose in the right place. We try not to plant if soil is too wet or too dry. Sometimes it is both in the same paddock.

We do know more about plant density and plant spacing. We know crops have a target population for best returns, and that many are sensitive to variable spacing between neighbours. Precision ag again  helps with planter controls. But maybe we are trying to plant too fast when under pressure to get seed into the ground. A lot of research has shown planting speed has a direct impact on yield, largely through spacing uniformity effects.

We know that planting equipment set up and operation has a big effect. Check planting rate is as intended. Get seed to even depth into moisture, cover it properly. Ensure every seed gets sufficient nutrients, but don’t put fertiliser too close.

There is some evidence that weather conditions straight after planting can have a big effect on emergence and establishment. Heavy rain caps weak soils, and if that dries we suffer.

Heavy rain after planting capped this soil and created poor conditions for germination and emergence.
Heavy rain after planting capped this soil and created poor conditions for germination and emergence.

If plants do emerge, they have to survive strong winds, hail, frost, birds and slugs.  And our herbicides.

And that is just getting to establishment. There is still most of the crop life to go, but it seems a fail to thrive infant never does as well as a bonny one.

 

MicroFarm News: Nov 2014

Recent postings on the MicroFarm Website

To November 2014

Spring on the MicroFarm

Two thirds of the way through spring our micropaddocks are approaching full canopy. Onions that progressed so slowly over winter are growing rapidly and peas planted in September are well established. A key question now is when to irrigate. More>

Crop covers laid on onions and peas

CosioPlotsWeb
Squares of Cosio cover cloth placed on peas and onions

Following the lead of Dr Charles Merfield at the BHU Future Farming Centre at Lincoln, we laid some trial crop covers at the MicroFarm. More>

Linear Move Irrigator

The MicroFarm has a linear move irrigator. The Ritchies replaced the original linear at Drumpeel, and after Hugh made some necessary adjustments to the old one, arrived with a truck and trailer carrying a single span linear and a Manitou to put it up with. More>

Irrigation: Do peas benefit? Do farmers?

At the MicroFarm, we just harvested our second lot of peas.  We tracked their water use since planting to build on learning from our first crop (see the December 2013 issue of “Grower” reproduced here>).

Once again, HydroServices’ Melanie Smith established three neutron probe access tubes in each of two crops. These were read weekly and analysed to tell us paddock soil moisture content down to 80 cm.

Both pea crops were planted on the same day with the same drill. Paddock 1 is dryland and Paddock 2 has drip irrigation installed 200mm deep.

Figures Paddock 1 and Paddock 2 show soil water content for each crop.

Paddock 1_Peas
Paddock 1_Peas
Paddock 2_Peas
Paddock 2_Peas

We see the crops tracked about the same at the start. In mid-December, Paddock 2 received two 9mm irrigations from our buried dripline.

Melanie estimated that the irrigation was 80% efficient, so only added about 7.5mm to the budget each time. Paddock 1 is not irrigated, and continued to drop towards stress point.

Paddock 1 reached Refill Point on Boxing Day two days before rain fortunately lifted it back out of stress. Paddock 1 again hit stress point on about 6th January. With no more significant rain, it stayed stressed. With irrigation applied as required, Paddock 2 remained stress-free throughout.

Overall, the two crops used similar amounts of water through until early January. After that the 0 – 30 cm soil reached stress point, and water use from the unirrigated Paddock 1 began to taper off.  The steeper lines in the bottom part of the graphs show it began to get more water from deeper in the profile.

By harvest, Paddock 1 was using only about half as much water as the drip irrigated Paddock 2 and drawing it from much deeper in the profile.

The difference in what a crop did use and what it could have used if the water was available is described by Potential Soil Moisture Deficit. We estimate that by harvest, Paddock 1 suffered about 100mm of PSMD. I am not sure what the pea response is to stress. I am told it is a “very elastic” crop. For many crops this would indicate a growth reduction of about 20%.

So did irrigation pay?

We sampled each crop pre-harvest and found Paddock 2 had about 30% more fresh weight canopy than Paddock 1. The difference was easily seen, being significantly taller and generally more “lush”. The peas in Paddock 1 reached harvest maturity at least three or four days before the irrigated peas in Paddock 2.

We get paid for peas not canopy. We also sampled yields and quality as measured by TR (pea tenderness) and found differences.

There was a lower tonnage in Paddock 2, but the quality (and pay-out value) was much higher.

At harvest the Paddock 1 tonnages were reasonable at 6.85 t/ha paid yield. But TR was 137; a bit high and the lowest pay-out grade.

We delayed harvesting Paddock 2 for two days. The paid yield was similar at 6.55 t/ha but the TR was 102, a 30% higher pay-out grade.

Paddock 1 returned $2,059/ha and Paddock 2 returned $2,625/ha gross, so a benefit of $566/ha from irrigation.

We applied 81 mm so our return from irrigation was $6.99/ha/mm applied. Many people quote an irrigation cost of about $2/ha/mm so let’s claim a benefit of $5/ha/mm applied.

Looking at it another way. If we had a 20ha paddock, irrigation would have made us about $8,000 better off. If we also sold pea hay, the benefit would be even greater.

Answer: Irrigation pays!

Thanks to: Centre for Land and Water, ThinkWater, Netafim, HydroServices, McCain Foods, Ballance AgriNutrients, BASF Crop Protection, FruitFed Supplies, Agronica NZ, Nicolle Contracting, Drumpeel Farms, Greville Ground Spraying, True Earth Organics, Tasman Harvesting, Plant & Food Research, Peracto NZ

LandWISE 2014 Event update

Ever Better: Farmers, land and water

Awapuni Function Centre, Palmerston North. 21-22 May 2014

Just two days to go to LandWISE 2014! The final programme and some tasters of individual presentations are on the website.

In a change to previous years, our “outdoor session” on Day 2 includes a bus tour of a small catchment with intensive land use – vegetable cropping and dairy farming – and a regionally significant lake. This will be in the middle of the day, with buses returning to the conference venue for the final afternoon presentations and panel discussion.

We have a focus on farm plans to avoid or minimise off-farm impacts, especially from sediments and nutrients. This is a critical issue now, and farmers need to understand how new expectations may affect their day to day activities.

Register hereSponsorSheet64

Many thanks to our Conference Sponsors and the many speakers and others who bring you this opportunity. We especially thank our Platinum Sponsors, BASF Crop Protection, AGMARDT and John Deere.

Please pass this message on to your friends and colleagues you believe would gain benefit from attending.

Peas and PGRs

LandWISE Conference Presentation – Seeking consistent high pea yields

Pea PGRs

Farmers have noted drought-stressed pea crops can out-yield more vigorous ones. The stressed plants seem to have flowering curtailed, while vigorous ones continue flowering and have late pods and peas that will not be mature at harvest.

The MicroFarm group is looking at plant growth regulators to condense flowering and therefore the harvestable proportion of the crop.

Plant growth regulators control things such as shoot and root growth, internode length, flowering, fruit set and ripening. They are widely used in horticulture and have been used to manipulate flowering times.

We tried a few options that have shown to have effect elsewhere. It was a first look to see if this is something worth researching further. Interesting results from the early crops encouraged us to try again with the later planting. Encouraging reults from that point to further work.

Plant & Food Research technician Christina Waldon will present results to date

Register here>

Sweetcorn Harvested

CornHarvest20140410_124642

SponsorsPanel

Many thanks to McCain Foods, Te Mata Contractors, Apatu Farms and Heinz-Watties for help harvesting our corn crop.

Given the wet week we were pleased to have a break in the weather and fortunate the soil was not excessively wet. Gross weight out was around 20 t/ha which, given we suffered a fair bit from drought stress is pleasing.

Ben Watson and Dan Bloomer took crop samples from both Paddocks (3 & 4) and from drip irrigated, spray irrigated and non-irrigated zones. We’ll be interested to see the results.

Next activity is a full deep ripping to at least 600mm to try and address the deep compaction we have identified. Regional Council soil health sampling, HydroServices data and our own digging shows a legacy from previous land use remains – despite seven years of pasture phase and minimal traffic. We have ripped before, but only to about 300 – 400mm.

After that we’ll be establishing our winter crops – selected from onions, oats and mustard cover crops.