Category Archives: Water

Integrated Stormwater Management

First published in NZ Grower Vol 69 No 06

A new initiative in Horowhenua will reduce sediment and nutrient input into the Arawhata Stream and Lake Horowhenua. And it will increase farm productivity by managing drainage and reducing crop losses.

LandWISE is working with local farmers, the Tararua Vegetable Growers’ Association and Horizons Regional Council in this Ministry for the Environment supported project.

The team will create integrated drainage and sediment control plans for up to 500ha of cropping farms. The plans will identify ways to manage risks using mix of land shaping and storm water management, supported as necessary by erosion control and sediment capture techniques. Where appropriate, cut and fill plans for reshaping will be prepared, enabling farmers to have automatic control of earthmoving equipment.

The current drainage system, actually the legacy of an historic stock drinking water race scheme, cannot contain run-off from severe storm events. Inadequate drains spill flood waters on to cropping land, creating strong rivers that erode cultivated soil and wash it, along with crops, into the Arawhata and into Lake Horowhenua. Nobody wins.

When drains fail, flood-generated erosion destroys valuable crops and discharges sediments to the stream and lake (John Clarke photo)
When drains fail, flood-generated erosion destroys valuable crops and discharges sediments to the stream and lake (John Clarke photo)

Local grower, John Clarke, believes additional drainage he has installed has addressed a large part of the problem. Interceptor drains and increased capacity capture and contain water from higher up the catchment, and guide it safely to the outlets.

More is needed. The whole system must work together from top to bottom. A problem on one farm inevitable flows on to the next.
Horizons staff have completed a survey of the existing drainage system, measuring channel dimensions and culvert sizes. They met with local growers to hear first-hand of the issues the growers understand only too well. They are now designing a new system that will be the core of enhanced drainage in the catchment.

Stock water system culverts do not provide necessary drainage capacity. A redesign is needed
Stock water system culverts do not provide necessary drainage capacity. A redesign is needed

On-farm, precision surveying with GPS tractors has begun. Using their Trimble technology, the growers can map their properties in 3D, with an error of millimetres.

High precision survey creates very accurate maps and allows drainage analysis and planning
High precision survey creates very accurate maps and allows drainage analysis and planning

The data collected will be processed using OptiSurface software that determines ponding areas, flow paths and depths. It can create optimized cut and fill plans requiring the minimum amount of soil movement that allows effective drainage. Those plans are fed back into the tractor guidance system and control the blade depth on ground shaping equipment.

Expectations are that ponding areas will be identified and removed through strategic levelling. This removes two problems: the bathtubs of ponded, stagnant water that can collect and row ends and destroy crops, and the risk of blow-outs that cause erosion and sediment being lost to the lake.

The third level of sediment management is retaining even small amounts of sediment through use of sediment control structures and filter plantings along farm drains. Small but continuous losses add up over time and can constitute a significant loss of nutrients from the farm, as well as more sediment load into the lake.

The project will see individual farm plans for each property that can be integrated in New Zealand GAP and used to demonstrate good practice to stakeholders.

The project is one of eight that together form the Fresh Start for Fresh Water Lake Horowhenua Freshwater Clean-up Fund programme. Horizons’ Fresh Water and Science Manager, Jon Roygard notes efforts to restore the lake have been ongoing for several decades, including in 1987 stopping the discharge of raw sewage into the lake. Recently, and almost complete, a full native planting buffer strip has been established around the lake.

Other efforts include harvesting lake-weed to remove nutrients, a sediment trap where the Arawhata enters the lake, storm water treatment upgrades, a boat wash facility, a fish pass, some further riparian fencing and planting of the tributaries and work with Dairy farmers to complete farm plans.

Visitors Return to Tennessee

After a month with LandWISE researching the implications should Tukituki Plan Change 6 rules be applied to the Heretaunga Plains, our two Interns have returned home.

Makenzie and Rachel at the Flaxmere Community Gardens
Makenzie and Rachel at the Flaxmere Community Gardens

While in Hawke’s Bay, they met a number of farmers, policy makers and community stakeholders in order to understand different perspectives. Their report is available here.

Rachel and Makenzie were also able to visit True Earth Organics, the BioRich compost facility at Maraekakaho, Te Aranga Marae and the Flaxmere Community Gardens.

We were also able to involve them in an afternoon of soil surface shear strength assessment at Eskdale. Appropriate health and safety equipment supplied by Centre for Land and Water staff.

Equipment used to assess soil surface shear strength on forested rolling hills at Eskdale
Equipment used to assess soil surface shear strength on forested rolling hills at Eskdale

Irrigation: Do peas benefit? Do farmers?

At the MicroFarm, we just harvested our second lot of peas.  We tracked their water use since planting to build on learning from our first crop (see the December 2013 issue of “Grower” reproduced here>).

Once again, HydroServices’ Melanie Smith established three neutron probe access tubes in each of two crops. These were read weekly and analysed to tell us paddock soil moisture content down to 80 cm.

Both pea crops were planted on the same day with the same drill. Paddock 1 is dryland and Paddock 2 has drip irrigation installed 200mm deep.

Figures Paddock 1 and Paddock 2 show soil water content for each crop.

Paddock 1_Peas
Paddock 1_Peas
Paddock 2_Peas
Paddock 2_Peas

We see the crops tracked about the same at the start. In mid-December, Paddock 2 received two 9mm irrigations from our buried dripline.

Melanie estimated that the irrigation was 80% efficient, so only added about 7.5mm to the budget each time. Paddock 1 is not irrigated, and continued to drop towards stress point.

Paddock 1 reached Refill Point on Boxing Day two days before rain fortunately lifted it back out of stress. Paddock 1 again hit stress point on about 6th January. With no more significant rain, it stayed stressed. With irrigation applied as required, Paddock 2 remained stress-free throughout.

Overall, the two crops used similar amounts of water through until early January. After that the 0 – 30 cm soil reached stress point, and water use from the unirrigated Paddock 1 began to taper off.  The steeper lines in the bottom part of the graphs show it began to get more water from deeper in the profile.

By harvest, Paddock 1 was using only about half as much water as the drip irrigated Paddock 2 and drawing it from much deeper in the profile.

The difference in what a crop did use and what it could have used if the water was available is described by Potential Soil Moisture Deficit. We estimate that by harvest, Paddock 1 suffered about 100mm of PSMD. I am not sure what the pea response is to stress. I am told it is a “very elastic” crop. For many crops this would indicate a growth reduction of about 20%.

So did irrigation pay?

We sampled each crop pre-harvest and found Paddock 2 had about 30% more fresh weight canopy than Paddock 1. The difference was easily seen, being significantly taller and generally more “lush”. The peas in Paddock 1 reached harvest maturity at least three or four days before the irrigated peas in Paddock 2.

We get paid for peas not canopy. We also sampled yields and quality as measured by TR (pea tenderness) and found differences.

There was a lower tonnage in Paddock 2, but the quality (and pay-out value) was much higher.

At harvest the Paddock 1 tonnages were reasonable at 6.85 t/ha paid yield. But TR was 137; a bit high and the lowest pay-out grade.

We delayed harvesting Paddock 2 for two days. The paid yield was similar at 6.55 t/ha but the TR was 102, a 30% higher pay-out grade.

Paddock 1 returned $2,059/ha and Paddock 2 returned $2,625/ha gross, so a benefit of $566/ha from irrigation.

We applied 81 mm so our return from irrigation was $6.99/ha/mm applied. Many people quote an irrigation cost of about $2/ha/mm so let’s claim a benefit of $5/ha/mm applied.

Looking at it another way. If we had a 20ha paddock, irrigation would have made us about $8,000 better off. If we also sold pea hay, the benefit would be even greater.

Answer: Irrigation pays!

Thanks to: Centre for Land and Water, ThinkWater, Netafim, HydroServices, McCain Foods, Ballance AgriNutrients, BASF Crop Protection, FruitFed Supplies, Agronica NZ, Nicolle Contracting, Drumpeel Farms, Greville Ground Spraying, True Earth Organics, Tasman Harvesting, Plant & Food Research, Peracto NZ

Tennessee Visitors

LandWISE is hosting two students from the University of Tennessee, Knoxville.

Rachel Eatherly and Makenzie Read are interns through a Massey University programme and are at LandWISE for the month of June. They are both studying Natural Resources and Environmental Economics, which influenced their decision to study abroad in New Zealand through Massey University’s Agricultural College.

Rachel Eatherly    Makenzie Read

Makenzie is concerned with methods of maintaining economic growth while minimizing the impact on water sources. Rachel is interested in sustainable farming practices to minimize the impact on the environment while also increasing profits and production.  So the interests of both align very well with LandWISE.

While at LandWISE, Rachel and Makenzie are considering the implications of applying the Tukituki Plan Change 6 to cropping on the Heretaunga Plains. In particular, they are examining the levels of awareness, the scale of potential impact, and what changes may be required if Plan Change 6 were to be implemented. They appreciate the support they have received from farmers, council, industry and other stakeholders. We will post their report once complete.

Their visit to New Zealand began with a two week tour starting in Christchurch. Travelling with five other colleagues and Massey representatives through Otago to the West Coast and Marlborough they saw our fascinating South Island landscapes and visited farms as well as natural areas. They then travelled around the North Island including stops at National Park, LIC in Hamilton, Auckland, Rotorua and Taupo before arriving in Hawke’s Bay.

Rachel and Makenzie

Rachel and Makenzie at Mt Nicholas Station on Lake Wakatipu

LandWISE 2014 Event update

Ever Better: Farmers, land and water

Awapuni Function Centre, Palmerston North. 21-22 May 2014

Just two days to go to LandWISE 2014! The final programme and some tasters of individual presentations are on the website.

In a change to previous years, our “outdoor session” on Day 2 includes a bus tour of a small catchment with intensive land use – vegetable cropping and dairy farming – and a regionally significant lake. This will be in the middle of the day, with buses returning to the conference venue for the final afternoon presentations and panel discussion.

We have a focus on farm plans to avoid or minimise off-farm impacts, especially from sediments and nutrients. This is a critical issue now, and farmers need to understand how new expectations may affect their day to day activities.

Register hereSponsorSheet64

Many thanks to our Conference Sponsors and the many speakers and others who bring you this opportunity. We especially thank our Platinum Sponsors, BASF Crop Protection, AGMARDT and John Deere.

Please pass this message on to your friends and colleagues you believe would gain benefit from attending.

2014 Farmer of the Year Field Day

Around 300 people attended the Silver Fern Farms Hawke’s Bay Farmer of the Year Field Day on 8 May. Hugh and Sharon Ritchie won the award and opened Horonui, Drumpeel and Wainui farms to public gaze.

A good selection of images from the day can be found on Kate Taylor’s website, rivettingkatetaylor.com. A sample image of folk at Drumpeel is below (thanks Kate)

foy-field-day-drumpeel

Kate Taylor’s photo of people visiting Drumpeel during the Farmer of the Year Field Day

The weather put on a good show as 120+ utes travelled across the three farms.

Horonui has most of the rolling hill country and is the largest part of the the animal enterprise. Check Kate’s photos to see more. The flats are used for cropping with a 50ha area block irrigated by a towable pivot fitting with variable rate technology.

Drumpeel has been the cropping base since Hugh’s parents David and Sally took over the farm and began developing it. Now fully irrigated it has been the site of many trials and field days over the years by FAR and companies testing seed and plant protection options. Hugh himself is constantly testing new ideas!

Hugh has hosted many LandWISE events and supported LandWISE Smart Farming investigations including pH mapping, EM soil scanning, minimum tillage, strip-tillage. Generally he’s been ahead of us.

The Drumpeel linear move irrigator was a test-bed for LandWISE nozzle option research into improving application uniformity. This has been a passion of Hugh’s since his Nuffield Scholarship when he visited Charles Burt at the Irrigation Training and Research Center in California.

Wainui is a new aquisition that adjoins Drumpeel. The Ritchies have just completed their first summer of cropping. A large centre pivot on Wainui has variable rate irrigation which should give increased flexibility and use a set amount of water most efficiently.  A programme of GPS surveying and levelling to enhance drainage at Wainui has begun. This will be discussed at the upcoming LandWISE Conference in Palmerston North on 21-22 May.

Once again, congratulations Hugh and Sharon and their family and staff.

Land-shaping to Control Water

Hugh RitchieHugh Ritchie has been using the power of his in-tractor GPS to efficiently map his farmland and generate optimum drainage plans. He is gaining significant benefits from both improved surface drainage and buried tile drains.

High accuracy tractor guidance system displays automatically record data from GPS and various machine controllers, meters and monitors. An accurate (+/- 20mm) auto-steer system typically consists of a GPS receiver and radio antenna mounted on the vehicle roof, a display or console within the cab, electronics to a steer assist or hydraulic steering system and a base station.

 

Trimble’s Field Level software is set up in the FMX console in Hugh’s tractor. Designed with assistance from drainage contractors in US and UK, Field Level is the key to very cost effective tile laying. The software surveys the paddock as the tractor drives along a planned drain line, the GPS measuring surface elevation to within 5cm. Field Level calculates the optimum design to fit the desired slope from the top end of the drain to the outlet. Guidance keeps the tine foot in the right place.

FMX_GPS_MappingThe software is also used to capture position and elevation data to create accurate 3D maps for surface drainage. Using the tractor as a survey tool, Hugh maps his paddocks then exports the data to OptiSurface which calculates best cut-and-fill plans to guide water to desired points in the paddock. The generated cut-and-fill plans are sent back to the tractor which guides either a scraper or levelling blade to shape the land.

Hugh will talk about his experiences at LandWISE 2014 – Ever Better: Farmers. land and water in Palmerston North on 21-22 May

Regional land use tracking

Analysing satellite data to identify land use and cropslcare

David Pairman, Heather North and Stella Belliss, Landcare Research

Remote sensing scientists at Landcare Research, in collaboration with Environment Canterbury, have developed a new capability for mapping agricultural land use from satellite imagery. The methods are aimed at gathering regional statistics on areas of various land use types, and their change over time. The maps of land use and crops can also be laid over other topographic data, for example soil maps, to see what land uses are occurring on what soils.

The maps, even though covering large areas (e.g. a 60 x 60 km satellite image) are detailed enough to show individual paddocks.

LandcareRemoteCropMapAn extract from a landuse map is shown at the left. This is an enlargement of summer 2011/12 classification, showing land use timing at paddock-level

Assuming suitable images can be acquired (the weather plays a part), it is possible to carry out a land use classification every 6 months, i.e. a summer and a winter land use map each year. This ability for frequent updating, and provision of paddock-level information, have prompted the researchers to ask farmers whether they see uses of such mapping for more local- or catchment-level applications of value to themselves.

The LandWISE Conference seems the ideal forum to put this question to a tech-savvy group of farmers. David will present land use maps from summer and winter classifications in Mid-Canterbury, and ask for input on potential farm-scale uses, such as alleviating some of the work in filling in agricultural statistics questionnaires, or other possibilities.

To find out more, come to the conference and tell David your reactions, ideas and aspirations.

Good practice, precision agriculture and farm plans

Good farm plans ensure we understand our resource base – primarily our land, water and climate – and manage to make production efficient. What will a cropping farm plan look like? What should be included?

We will achieve greater efficiency by carefully monitoring our inputs and outputs, and applying just enough to get the results we want. Nutrients, water, cultivation and crop protection can be necessary inputs but we don’t want too much of a good thing. We also get efficiency by planning so each action fits properly into the mix of daily, weekly, monthly and longer term events.

The 2014 LandWISE Conference in Palmerston North will focus on the constant drive to improve performance on and off farm. Farming never has, and never should, stand still. Much on-going improvement is now linked to precision agriculture, and the timely application of intelligence. But we must still get the basics right.

LandWISE farmers are leaders in precision agriculture. Initial steps for most were GPS tractor guidance, offering immediate input efficiency gains and importantly reducing fatigue. Many farmers have stopped there. Others have leapt ahead.

Leaders are capturing increasing benefits by mixing precise positioning with automation, sensor technologies, smart software and their own ingenuity. Some hone in on precision nutrient management with detailed mapping and variable rate application. Others have become highly skilled at level surveying and land shaping to assure good drainage.

Precision agriculture is a whole shopping trolley of tools and techniques. The best options for one farmer on one farm may be quite different for another. Massey University Professor of Precision Agriculture Ian Yule describes this as “bricolage”, a French word for tinkering.

In fine arts bricolage describes the construction or creation of a work from a diverse range of things that happen to be available. Farmers tend to be excellent tinkerers. When aware of the huge choice in the precision agriculture shopping trolley, they are able to develop a unique package that best suits them and their farm system.

The LandWISE Conference provides a meeting place where opportunities and ideas can be shared and custom solutions built from what happens to be available.

Keynote speaker Rod Collins from Agri-science Queensland is an experienced research agronomist, working with growers to implement a voluntary self-assessment and planning process. He will share thoughts on Implementing Best Practice, multi-sector efforts to integrate environment and economics, and accelerating adoption of farming practices that improve catchment water quality.

On Day 1, Conference delegates can also anticipate stories from Controlled Traffic for vegetables in Tasmania, impacts of reverting from CTF to RTF in Auckland, advances in crop sensing at regional scale, and precision ag research and implementation in New Zealand and overseas. There will be updates on nutrient management, irrigation management, drainage planning, technologies and implementation, and land shaping.

On Day 2, we turn our focus to the Arawhata Catchment near Levin. With the Tararua Vegetable Growers’ Association and Horizons Regional Council, we will tour Lake Horowhenua and farms. We will look at tools that can help us improve drainage and increase production while reducing sediment and nutrient losses.

With farm plans forming the base of future management and regulation, we’ll think about what is involved. What should a cropping farm plan look like? Where might we get information to support our planning? How can precision agriculture help?

LandWISE 2014: Ever Better – farmers, land and water

21-22 May 2014
Awapuni Function Centre
Palmerston North

Many thanks to our Platinum Conference Sponsors, BASF Crop Protection and John Deere. Thanks also to Gold sponsors, Potatoes New Zealand and Process Vegetables New Zealand, Horizons Regional Council and Trimble Ag specialists, GPS Control Systems.
More details 

New Project: Fertiliser Calibration

JDcalibrationLandWISE has been granted funding to develop fertiliser application calibration procedures suitable for farmers applying nutrients with their own equipment. The two year Ministry for Primary Industries’ Sustainable Farming Fund project is co-funded by the Foundation for Arable Research (FAR) and the Fertiliser Association of New Zealand (FertResearch). Work will begin in July.

Why have this project?

Intensive farming is under intense scrutiny as impacts on soil and fresh water are questioned. Nutrient budgeting is a critical aspect of fertiliser practice. Knowing what should be done is important. Knowing what is actually done is important too. This project will allow on-farm checks to ensure and demonstrate that their own or contracted application equipment is performing to expectations.

Recommendations and nutrient management plans from fertiliser and agricultural consultants assume the fertiliser material will be spread evenly and accurately over the target area at the target application rate. Poor spreading can negate the best management plans and result in significant production losses and pollution of waterways.

The Fertiliser Industry Code of Practice for Nutrient Management notes greater precision in fertiliser application is increasingly important if profits are to be lifted by more intensive farming.  Intensification brings a greater risk of negative impacts on farm profits and on the environment through errors and inefficiencies in fertiliser application. Fertiliser and its application is often the single biggest discretionary expense.

What will be done?

This project will deliver protocols, guidelines, templates and training modules for farmers doing their
own ground based fertiliser application. Calibration is familiar to farmers for agrichemical application. It is increasingly applied for irrigation, to achieve water use efficiencies and reduce the risk of drainage and leaching. The new aspect is applying to fertiliser placement, distribution uniformity measures as well as gross per hectare application rates.

Most fertiliser applicator manufacturers provide guidelines to calibrate equipment. However, usually only the bulk application per hectare is determined, not the uniformity of application. This is a critical omission, as poor distribution significantly impacts yield and increases risk of leaching losses.

Ground based application includes a wide range of application methods to apply a vast array of fertiliser products, requiring careful matching of equipment and technique to the fertiliser and production system.

FertSpreadThe project will address the two broad types of ground based spreading equipment:

  • equipment that spreads fertiliser beyond the width of the machine – e.g. bulk spinners
  • equipment where the swath width is equal to or less than the width of the machine – e.g. boom sprayers, combine drills, pneumatic top dressers.

The key performance criteria will be defined and expected levels provided.
Clear calibration protocols will be supported with guidelines and templates to ensure their correct implementation and for record keeping.

A training module and resources suitable for delivery to farm fertiliser managers and staff will be developed. Training opportunities will be provided at various locations around the country.
Together the project outputs will enable farmers to suitably calibrate equipment and record data pertaining to efficient use of nutrients. Their records will support industry QA programmes and demonstrate regulatory compliance.

For more information, contact Dan Bloomer at LandWISE:

FARFertResearchsff no web address sm